Member guide

The ethics of AI in research: what Cambridge's rules say and where the debate happens

Can an AI be an author? When does using ChatGPT become misconduct? What Cambridge University Press and the University actually require, and the research centres where the questions are argued out.

By the Cambridge Society editorial desk · Updated 14 September 2026

The entrance of the William Gates Building, home of Cambridge's Department of Computer Science and Technology

Generative AI tools raise practical ethical questions for anyone who does research or studies. Can an AI system be credited as an author? Where is the line between using a tool and passing off someone else's work? Who is accountable when AI-assisted research goes wrong?

Cambridge is a useful place to look for answers, for two reasons. Its publisher and its university have both written down clear rules, and the university hosts several research centres that study how AI affects society. This guide sets out what the rules say and where the wider debate takes place.

Can an AI be an author? What Cambridge University Press says

Cambridge University Press sets out its position in its research publishing ethics guidelines for journals. The key points are:

AI cannot be an author. AI does not meet Cambridge's requirements for authorship, because authorship requires accountability. AI and large language model tools may not be listed as an author on any scholarly work Cambridge publishes.
Use must be declared. Any use of AI must be declared and clearly explained in the publication, in the same way that researchers describe other software, tools and methods.
Authors stay accountable. Authors are responsible for the accuracy, integrity and originality of their papers, including any part produced with AI.
Plagiarism rules still apply. Using AI must not breach the publisher's plagiarism policy. The work must be the author's own, and others' ideas, data or words must be properly cited.

Individual journals may add more specific requirements, so researchers should also read the guidelines of the journal they are submitting to.

When does AI use become misconduct? The University's rule for students

The University of Cambridge has a University-wide statement on generative AI in summative assessment, the work that counts towards a student's result. A student who uses unacknowledged AI-generated content in a summative assessment as though it were their own work commits academic misconduct, unless the assessment brief explicitly says otherwise.

The University's guidance for staff adds several practical points:

Local rules matter. Uses vary across subjects, so students should read the guidance from their own department or faculty and the instructions for each assignment.
Detection software is not relied on. The guidance advises staff not to rely on AI detection software, because it is not proven to be accurate or reliable and provides no evidence for an investigation.
Declare how AI was used. Where AI is allowed, staff are encouraged to explain how students should declare their use and describe what they did.
Examiners may not upload student work. Examiners on all programmes are not permitted to upload, copy or share students' work with generative AI tools to analyse it or write feedback. They may use such tools to help write up their own notes.

The guidance also encourages open discussion of AI in independent study, including its ethical implications and the risks of relying on it too much.

Where the questions are studied

The entrance of the Alison Richard Building on the University of Cambridge's Sidgwick Site — The Alison Richard Building on West Road, home of CRASSH. Photo: Vysotsky, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0).

Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence

The Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence (CFI) is an interdisciplinary research centre at the University of Cambridge that studies artificial intelligence. It was founded in 2016 and is funded by the Leverhulme Trust. It brings together researchers from computer science, philosophy, the social sciences and other fields. Its research programmes have included AI: Futures and Responsibility, AI: Trust and Society, Kinds of Intelligence, AI: Narrative and Justice, and Philosophy and Ethics of AI.

Centre for the Study of Existential Risk

The Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER) was founded in 2012 by the philosopher Huw Price, the Astronomer Royal Martin Rees and the Skype co-founder Jaan Tallinn. It studies extreme risks from present and future technology, including risks from advanced AI. In 2016 it launched its first spin-off, the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence. CSER's public lectures have been viewed more than 500,000 times online.

Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy

The Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy is part of CRASSH, the University's Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, based in the Alison Richard Building on West Road. It researches how digital technologies affect democracy and society. Its executive director is the sociologist Gina Neff, formerly of the Oxford Internet Institute.

ai@cam

ai@cam is the University's mission to develop AI for the benefit of science, citizens and society. In July 2026 it published the full report of a public dialogue with Cambridgeshire residents on the use of AI in local government.

The Department of Computer Science and Technology

The technical side of the subject is taught and researched at the Department of Computer Science and Technology, formerly the Computer Laboratory. It was founded in 1937 and has been based in the William Gates Building in West Cambridge since 2001.

How to follow the debate

Check each centre's own website. CFI, CSER, the Minderoo Centre and ai@cam each publish their news and events. Check who each event is open to before you go.
Read the rules at source. Before you submit a paper or an assignment, read the current Cambridge University Press guidelines, your journal's own rules and your department's guidance.
Meet people from other fields. Questions about AI and research cut across disciplines. Our Saturday Exchange Meetup is an informal place to talk them through with founders, scientists and professionals.

For the wider technology scene, see our guide to Silicon Fen.

Frequently asked questions

Can an AI be listed as an author in a Cambridge journal?

No. Cambridge University Press says AI does not meet its requirements for authorship, because authorship requires accountability, and AI tools may not be listed as an author on any scholarly work it publishes. Any use of AI must be declared and explained.

Is using ChatGPT academic misconduct at Cambridge?

Using unacknowledged AI-generated content in a summative assessment as though it were your own work is academic misconduct, unless the assessment brief says otherwise. Rules for other uses vary by department, so read your faculty's guidance and each assignment brief.

Does Cambridge use AI detection software?

The University's guidance advises staff not to rely on AI detection software, because it is not proven to be accurate or reliable and provides no evidence for an investigation.

Which Cambridge centres research the ethics of AI?

They include the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence, the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk and the Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy, alongside the University's ai@cam mission.

Glossary

Cambridge terms used in this article. Each links to its entry in our Cambridge A–Z.

Spin-out: A new company formed to commercialise research or intellectual property developed inside the University.
Silicon Fen: The working name of the technology cluster in and around Cambridge, built on software, electronics and biotechnology firms.

Sources

Join the Society

This is an independent member's guide compiled by Cambridge Society. We are not affiliated with the venues and institutions mentioned; opening arrangements change, so always confirm details on the official websites before making plans.

← Back to Articles